Home/Compare/Privatis vs 73 Strings

Privatis vs 73 Strings: the mark, and the ledger it lands in.

73 Strings is an AI-native valuation and monitoring specialist. Privatis values the portfolio too — and then posts the approved mark to the fund's general ledger, where it moves NAV, carry and every LP capital account.

See all comparisons
13 / 13
capability areas native in Privatis, on one general ledger
3 / 13
native in 73 Strings, from its public materials as of October 2026
Head to head

Privatis and 73 Strings, area by area.

73 Strings doesn't cover 10 areas natively in its software: deal CRM & pipeline; LP fundraising CRM & onboarding; fund general ledger the GP runs; waterfall, carry & management fees; LP portal & ILPA reporting; regulatory filings (ADV, PF, FATCA, CRS); partnership tax (1065, K-1, K-2/K-3); deal VDR & LP data rooms; issuer cap table & equity plans; private credit & covenant monitoring. In Privatis, all 13 post to and read from the same ledger.

CapabilityPrivatis73 Strings
Deal CRM & pipeline
LP fundraising CRM & onboarding
Fund general ledger the GP runs
Waterfall, carry & management fees
Valuation modeling that produces the mark
Portfolio monitoring & KPI collection
LP portal & ILPA reporting
Regulatory filings (ADV, PF, FATCA, CRS)
Partnership tax (1065, K-1, K-2/K-3)
Deal VDR & LP data rooms
Issuer cap table & equity plans
Private credit & covenant monitoring
AI assistant
Native in the softwareAAdded by a 2025–26 acquisitionPartialSDelivered as an outsourced serviceNot offered, or not found in public materials
About 73 Strings

What 73 Strings does well, and where it stops.

Built for: Large GPs and administrators that want an AI-assisted valuation and monitoring layer alongside their existing systems.

2025: $55M Series B led by Goldman Sachs Alternatives. 2026: acquired Callisto (agentic AI) and added CohnReznick as a service partner.

Strong at

Deep, AI-assisted valuation and portfolio monitoring, with a strong institutional client base.

Where it stops

A point solution by design. The mark still has to be carried into a GL, a capital account and an LP statement that someone else maintains.

Choose Privatis over 73 Strings if
  • 01You want the approved mark to post to the GL and flow to NAV, the Level 3 rollforward and LP statements automatically.
  • 02You'd rather consolidate valuations into the platform that runs your fund than add another point tool.
  • 03You also need the deal CRM, LP portal, filings and K-1s.
73 Strings may suit you better if

You only need a specialist valuation layer, and your fund accounting and investor reporting are already settled elsewhere.

What one ledger changes

The same entry, everywhere it matters.

Every Privatis module posts to and reads from one general ledger. That's what makes these possible without an integration in between.

01

A signed commitment becomes a capital account

The LP CRM, the subscription documents and the general ledger are the same record, so nothing is re-keyed between fundraising and the books.

02

An approved mark posts to the GL

DCF, comps, LBO and option-pricing backsolves reconcile to one fair value. Approving it posts the journal entry that moves NAV, the Level 3 rollforward and every LP capital account.

03

Carry is computed from the books it's paid from

European, American and hybrid waterfalls, with catch-up and quarterly accrual, read the same capital and the same LPA terms the fee engine uses.

04

The K-1 ties to the financial statements

The 1065, K-1s and K-2/K-3s come from the same 704(b) capital as the GAAP statements and LP capital accounts. There's no hand-off to a separate tax file.

05

Filings start from the fund's own data

Form ADV, Form PF, FATCA, CRS and FBAR are produced as filing-ready exports from live holdings and capital, not re-keyed into a consultant's template.

06

The data room follows the deal into the portfolio

The target you diligenced becomes the portfolio company on the same record: data room, cap structure, KPIs, covenants and valuation history together.

07

AI that can read everything and change nothing on its own

AlphaBot works across deals, funds, credit and LP data, inside your information walls. Every change it suggests is a proposal that a person approves.

Privatis vs 73 Strings: questions

Is Privatis an alternative to 73 Strings?
Yes. Privatis includes valuation modeling — DCF, comps, LBO, option-pricing backsolves and DLOM — and portfolio KPI collection, on the same platform as the fund ledger and LP reporting.
What is the main difference between Privatis and 73 Strings?
73 Strings produces valuations and monitoring as a specialist layer. In Privatis, approving a mark posts the journal entry that updates NAV, carry accrual and every LP capital account.
Does 73 Strings include fund accounting?
We couldn't find a fund general ledger in 73 Strings' public materials as of October 2026. Privatis is built on one.
Other comparisons

Based on 73 Strings's public product pages, press releases and trade coverage as of October 2026. A capability counts as native when it's sold as software the GP's own team runs. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll correct it. Privatis produces regulatory and tax outputs as filing-ready exports for your filer of record.

73 Strings and all other product names are trademarks of their respective owners, used here for identification and comparison only. Privatis is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.

Comparing against 73 Strings? See Privatis on your numbers.

Bring one fund. We'll take a deal from the pipeline to the K-1 in a single workspace, with every number tracing back to the same journal entry.

Privatis — the operating system for private equity · privatis.coOne general ledger · every report agrees