Home/Compare/Privatis vs Carta

Privatis vs Carta: the Carta alternative built on one ledger.

Carta grew from cap tables into fund administration, and in 2026 bought its way into CRM. Privatis was built as one platform from the start, so the deal, the fund ledger, the LP and the K-1 are the same record.

See all comparisons
13 / 13
capability areas native in Privatis, on one general ledger
9 / 13
native in Carta, from its public materials as of October 2026
Head to head

Privatis and Carta, area by area.

Carta doesn't cover 4 areas natively in its software: waterfall, carry & management fees; regulatory filings (ADV, PF, FATCA, CRS); partnership tax (1065, K-1, K-2/K-3); private credit & covenant monitoring. In Privatis, all 13 post to and read from the same ledger.

CapabilityPrivatisCarta
Deal CRM & pipelineA
LP fundraising CRM & onboarding
Fund general ledger the GP runs
Waterfall, carry & management fees
Valuation modeling that produces the mark
Portfolio monitoring & KPI collection
LP portal & ILPA reporting
Regulatory filings (ADV, PF, FATCA, CRS)
Partnership tax (1065, K-1, K-2/K-3)S
Deal VDR & LP data rooms
Issuer cap table & equity plans
Private credit & covenant monitoring
AI assistant
Native in the softwareAAdded by a 2025–26 acquisitionPartialSDelivered as an outsourced serviceNot offered, or not found in public materials
About Carta

What Carta does well, and where it stops.

Built for: Venture funds and emerging managers that started on Carta's cap table and grew into its fund admin.

2026: bought ListAlpha (deal & LP CRM) and Avantia (Carta Law); launched fund-of-funds and Claude plugins.

Strong at

The broadest offering after Privatis. Cap tables are its core, and fund admin, ASC 820 valuations and an LP portal sit on top.

Where it stops

The CRM arrived by acquisition in 2026. Partnership tax is a service from Carta's own team, and we found no regulatory filings or private-credit monitoring. It was built for venture and emerging managers.

Choose Privatis over Carta if
  • 01You run buyout or credit strategies, where waterfalls, covenants and regulatory filings need to sit on the same books as the fund.
  • 02You want your own team posting to the general ledger, not a service desk working in it for you.
  • 03You want the deal CRM, data rooms and fund ledger to be one record rather than a 2026 acquisition being integrated.
Carta may suit you better if

You're a venture fund that wants a vendor's team to run fund admin and tax, and your portfolio companies already keep their cap tables on Carta.

What one ledger changes

The same entry, everywhere it matters.

Every Privatis module posts to and reads from one general ledger. That's what makes these possible without an integration in between.

01

A signed commitment becomes a capital account

The LP CRM, the subscription documents and the general ledger are the same record, so nothing is re-keyed between fundraising and the books.

02

An approved mark posts to the GL

DCF, comps, LBO and option-pricing backsolves reconcile to one fair value. Approving it posts the journal entry that moves NAV, the Level 3 rollforward and every LP capital account.

03

Carry is computed from the books it's paid from

European, American and hybrid waterfalls, with catch-up and quarterly accrual, read the same capital and the same LPA terms the fee engine uses.

04

The K-1 ties to the financial statements

The 1065, K-1s and K-2/K-3s come from the same 704(b) capital as the GAAP statements and LP capital accounts. There's no hand-off to a separate tax file.

05

Filings start from the fund's own data

Form ADV, Form PF, FATCA, CRS and FBAR are produced as filing-ready exports from live holdings and capital, not re-keyed into a consultant's template.

06

The data room follows the deal into the portfolio

The target you diligenced becomes the portfolio company on the same record: data room, cap structure, KPIs, covenants and valuation history together.

07

AI that can read everything and change nothing on its own

AlphaBot works across deals, funds, credit and LP data, inside your information walls. Every change it suggests is a proposal that a person approves.

Privatis vs Carta: questions

Is Privatis an alternative to Carta?
Yes. Privatis covers what GPs typically use Carta for — fund accounting, an LP portal, valuations and issuer cap tables — and adds a deal CRM, deal data rooms, regulatory filing exports, partnership tax and private credit, all on one general ledger your team runs.
What is the main difference between Privatis and Carta?
Carta combines software with services: its team can run your fund admin and prepares K-1s in-house. Privatis is software your own team operates, with every module posting to one ledger, so the LP portal, the financial statements and the K-1 read the same entries.
Does Carta generate Form PF or Form ADV?
We couldn't find regulatory filing generation in Carta's public materials as of October 2026. Privatis produces Form ADV, Form PF, FATCA, CRS and FBAR as filing-ready exports from the fund's own data.
Other comparisons

Based on Carta's public product pages, press releases and trade coverage as of October 2026. A capability counts as native when it's sold as software the GP's own team runs. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll correct it. Privatis produces regulatory and tax outputs as filing-ready exports for your filer of record.

Carta and all other product names are trademarks of their respective owners, used here for identification and comparison only. Privatis is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.

Comparing against Carta? See Privatis on your numbers.

Bring one fund. We'll take a deal from the pipeline to the K-1 in a single workspace, with every number tracing back to the same journal entry.

Privatis — the operating system for private equity · privatis.coOne general ledger · every report agrees