Home/Compare/Privatis vs SS&C

Privatis vs SS&C: software your team runs, on one ledger.

SS&C is the largest private equity administrator and owns Intralinks, Geneva and more. Privatis takes the opposite approach: one platform your own team operates, where every module posts to the same general ledger.

See all comparisons
13 / 13
capability areas native in Privatis, on one general ledger
6 / 13
native in SS&C, from its public materials as of October 2026
Head to head

Privatis and SS&C, area by area.

SS&C doesn't cover 7 areas natively in its software: deal CRM & pipeline; waterfall, carry & management fees; valuation modeling that produces the mark; portfolio monitoring & KPI collection; regulatory filings (ADV, PF, FATCA, CRS); partnership tax (1065, K-1, K-2/K-3); issuer cap table & equity plans. In Privatis, all 13 post to and read from the same ledger.

CapabilityPrivatisSS&C
Deal CRM & pipeline
LP fundraising CRM & onboarding
Fund general ledger the GP runs
Waterfall, carry & management feesS
Valuation modeling that produces the mark
Portfolio monitoring & KPI collection
LP portal & ILPA reporting
Regulatory filings (ADV, PF, FATCA, CRS)S
Partnership tax (1065, K-1, K-2/K-3)S
Deal VDR & LP data rooms
Issuer cap table & equity plans
Private credit & covenant monitoring
AI assistant
Native in the softwareAAdded by a 2025–26 acquisitionPartialSDelivered as an outsourced serviceNot offered, or not found in public materials
About SS&C

What SS&C does well, and where it stops.

Built for: Large and mid-sized GPs that want to outsource fund administration to a single, very large provider.

Calls itself the largest PE administrator, with about $845B under administration. Intralinks, Geneva and Precision LM sit under one logo.

Strong at

Scale and process maturity. Intralinks is the best-known deal data room, and the administration team will run your back office.

Where it stops

These are separately acquired products, not one data model. Waterfalls, regulatory filings and K-1s come as services.

Choose Privatis over SS&C if
  • 01You want real-time access to your own books instead of waiting on an administrator's reporting cycle.
  • 02You want your data room, fund ledger and LP portal to be one system, not separately acquired products.
  • 03You want waterfalls, filings and K-1s to be software you can rerun, not a service request.
SS&C may suit you better if

You want to hand your whole back office to an administrator and don't need your team working in the ledger day to day.

What one ledger changes

The same entry, everywhere it matters.

Every Privatis module posts to and reads from one general ledger. That's what makes these possible without an integration in between.

01

A signed commitment becomes a capital account

The LP CRM, the subscription documents and the general ledger are the same record, so nothing is re-keyed between fundraising and the books.

02

An approved mark posts to the GL

DCF, comps, LBO and option-pricing backsolves reconcile to one fair value. Approving it posts the journal entry that moves NAV, the Level 3 rollforward and every LP capital account.

03

Carry is computed from the books it's paid from

European, American and hybrid waterfalls, with catch-up and quarterly accrual, read the same capital and the same LPA terms the fee engine uses.

04

The K-1 ties to the financial statements

The 1065, K-1s and K-2/K-3s come from the same 704(b) capital as the GAAP statements and LP capital accounts. There's no hand-off to a separate tax file.

05

Filings start from the fund's own data

Form ADV, Form PF, FATCA, CRS and FBAR are produced as filing-ready exports from live holdings and capital, not re-keyed into a consultant's template.

06

The data room follows the deal into the portfolio

The target you diligenced becomes the portfolio company on the same record: data room, cap structure, KPIs, covenants and valuation history together.

07

AI that can read everything and change nothing on its own

AlphaBot works across deals, funds, credit and LP data, inside your information walls. Every change it suggests is a proposal that a person approves.

Privatis vs SS&C: questions

Is Privatis an alternative to SS&C?
Privatis is an alternative to SS&C's software stack rather than to administration as a service. It covers fund accounting, data rooms, the LP portal, waterfalls, filings and K-1s as one platform your team runs — and many firms keep an administrator alongside it.
What is the main difference between Privatis and SS&C?
SS&C delivers much of its private equity offering as a service across separately acquired products. Privatis is a single platform with one general ledger, so a capital call, a mark or a K-1 traces to the same journal entry in every view.
Can I use Privatis with a fund administrator?
Yes. Privatis is operating software for your team. Your administrator, auditor and counsel stay essential — with one ledger to agree on and fewer manual handoffs.
Other comparisons

Based on SS&C's public product pages, press releases and trade coverage as of October 2026. A capability counts as native when it's sold as software the GP's own team runs. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll correct it. Privatis produces regulatory and tax outputs as filing-ready exports for your filer of record.

SS&C and all other product names are trademarks of their respective owners, used here for identification and comparison only. Privatis is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.

Comparing against SS&C? See Privatis on your numbers.

Bring one fund. We'll take a deal from the pipeline to the K-1 in a single workspace, with every number tracing back to the same journal entry.

Privatis — the operating system for private equity · privatis.coOne general ledger · every report agrees